![]() ![]() Its insurance policy also excluded coverage for loss of property “that is missing, but there is no physical evidence to show what happened to it, such as shortage disclosed on taking inventory.” The insured argued that its description of the laptops as “missing” was, in effect, physical evidence of what happened to them. The insured submitted a claim for the loss of fifty-seven laptops that it found to be missing while taking inventory. ![]() Boston, the insured was in the business of providing computer education and its business property included laptops. The Sixth Circuit confronted a similar issue in C.T.S.C. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |